With our journalists 'right' favorite we learn, oh wonder, that the French fertility continues its meteoric rise and is on track to reach the threshold of 2.1 children per woman needed to renew generations. We all know that if, indeed, the French-born fertility is up from the 90s, women's contribution to non-European national fertility remains considerable. In fact, without the contribution Women of African and North African fertility rate of French women do not succeed in approaching the 2 children per woman and would parallel that of their European peers. Nothing new under the sun.
The result of the section devoted "to the reality of miscegenation," however, is much more edifying
In Reading this kind of nonsense that we are entitled to ask questions about the intellectual level of those expected to inform the population. First, French nationality is a citizen of paper, an individual may be French and to belong to any race . Then, many people of foreign origin who have acquired French nationality since the 80s marry persons of the same ethnicity but No ATIONALITY foreign . Talking miscegenation (involving two different races) is therefore completely misleading shorthand, since in many cases the spouses belong to the same ethnic group.
So according to the geniuses of INSEE and Figaro, when my neighbor Maghreb, a French citizen, married his cousin just arrived from corn is a mixed marriage, a reality of miscegenation (!). Conversely, when an individual of French nationality but of Senegalese origin puts the ring on the finger of a Breton of the soil, it is not considered a mixed marriage. In contrast, when the Alsatian-born wife, a German European, it's a mixed marriage! You'll understand that in states multiracial, used as the sole criterion for membership of nationality is an absurdity that does not name almost no additional information.
The only reliable way to identify mixed marriages and the rate of interbreeding in France is, like all other civilized countries, to establish ethnic statistics. But that our officials will never accept it. Indeed, more than the "reality of miscegenation" is the reality of ethnic substitution going on in this country who burst into the open.
The result of the section devoted "to the reality of miscegenation," however, is much more edifying
The number of children of mixed couples is growing, too, strongly. In the postwar period, marriages between a French and a person of foreign nationality were rare - around 5%. A stable level until the 1970s, before reaching, gradually, 14% of marriages celebrated in city halls in 2007. This figure reflects only partially the reality of mixed marriages, civil partnerships and cohabitation ignorant.
But statistics can however identify children from at least one foreign parent. They accounted for 8% of births in 1998 and 12, 7% last year. A jump that contrasts with the stability of children born in households with two foreign parents, which is around 6.9%. Miscegenation has become a major demographic shift, with one in five children in some foreign roots.
In Reading this kind of nonsense that we are entitled to ask questions about the intellectual level of those expected to inform the population. First, French nationality is a citizen of paper, an individual may be French and to belong to any race . Then, many people of foreign origin who have acquired French nationality since the 80s marry persons of the same ethnicity but No ATIONALITY foreign . Talking miscegenation (involving two different races) is therefore completely misleading shorthand, since in many cases the spouses belong to the same ethnic group.
So according to the geniuses of INSEE and Figaro, when my neighbor Maghreb, a French citizen, married his cousin just arrived from corn is a mixed marriage, a reality of miscegenation (!). Conversely, when an individual of French nationality but of Senegalese origin puts the ring on the finger of a Breton of the soil, it is not considered a mixed marriage. In contrast, when the Alsatian-born wife, a German European, it's a mixed marriage! You'll understand that in states multiracial, used as the sole criterion for membership of nationality is an absurdity that does not name almost no additional information.
The only reliable way to identify mixed marriages and the rate of interbreeding in France is, like all other civilized countries, to establish ethnic statistics. But that our officials will never accept it. Indeed, more than the "reality of miscegenation" is the reality of ethnic substitution going on in this country who burst into the open.
0 comments:
Post a Comment