My readers may think that I hold a special hatred in the official journal of the UMP (Le Figaro for newcomers). In truth, it does not go a day without a docket duck centro-dextriste afflicts us an article of such intellectual poverty it is essential to expose it to light. The latest example: the disaffection of students has English for French . Excerpts follow:
There. We are told that the share of French, German and English diminishes the choices of young British foreign languages, but parallel, that of Chinese, Arabic and Polish increases significantly. The most obvious explanation would be understood that 1) the descendants of immigrants in the United Kingdom tend to choose the language of their ancestors as course selection, and as they are becoming more numerous, from "exotic" languages increase in proportion 2) the hegemony of English as global language loss and cultural influence of Old Europe would render obsolete the eyes of many young English learning languages such as French and German.
But no! The "education specialists" (so effective that the educational system of their country is laughing stock of Europe and their young have lost two IQ points in thirty years ) and our rocket scientist Figaro believe that 1) it is the fault of the government, then explained black and white that the disaffection of the French date seven years and the government's decision not date her, that five years 2) young people choose the subjects most easy! As if the Chinese and Arabic were easier to learn than German or French for English speakers! As for being so easy "religion", I do not know what they are but they are undoubtedly consist of a breviary multicultural pantheistic as Western governments know so well put together, or learning a few surahs for Muslims students.
To summarize, once again, those whose profession or vocation, is to inform the public fail miserably in their mission superbly ignoring the real causes of the observed phenomena (immigration and the substitution of population) for tinker explanations devoid of any factual basis, but compatible with the doxa the moment.
Did you know?
According to Richard Lynn, emeritus professor University of Ulster, about 20% of the UK population would be non-European origin?
"French continues to lose ground in English schools. In one year, the number of British schoolboys who have a French test for their GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education, equivalent patent in France) fell 6.5%. In seven years, this figure was almost halved, from 341,000 in 2002 to only 188,000 last year. This represents more than 4 students.
German known as a sharp decline, whereas English is stable - but it has traditionally been less studied. The only languages which are progressing steadily, although still a minority, are Chinese, Polish and Arabic.
Disillusionment with the language of Molière is mainly the result of a political decision 5 years ago. In 2004, the government Tony Blair had removed the requirement to learn at least one foreign language from 14 years - a populist decision which has been criticized by all experts in education.
...
To increase their chances of having good grades, hold more materials called "easy" as the religion [sic], computer, music or physical education, rather than foreign languages deemed difficult. "
There. We are told that the share of French, German and English diminishes the choices of young British foreign languages, but parallel, that of Chinese, Arabic and Polish increases significantly. The most obvious explanation would be understood that 1) the descendants of immigrants in the United Kingdom tend to choose the language of their ancestors as course selection, and as they are becoming more numerous, from "exotic" languages increase in proportion 2) the hegemony of English as global language loss and cultural influence of Old Europe would render obsolete the eyes of many young English learning languages such as French and German.
But no! The "education specialists" (so effective that the educational system of their country is laughing stock of Europe and their young have lost two IQ points in thirty years ) and our rocket scientist Figaro believe that 1) it is the fault of the government, then explained black and white that the disaffection of the French date seven years and the government's decision not date her, that five years 2) young people choose the subjects most easy! As if the Chinese and Arabic were easier to learn than German or French for English speakers! As for being so easy "religion", I do not know what they are but they are undoubtedly consist of a breviary multicultural pantheistic as Western governments know so well put together, or learning a few surahs for Muslims students.
To summarize, once again, those whose profession or vocation, is to inform the public fail miserably in their mission superbly ignoring the real causes of the observed phenomena (immigration and the substitution of population) for tinker explanations devoid of any factual basis, but compatible with the doxa the moment.
Did you know?
According to Richard Lynn, emeritus professor University of Ulster, about 20% of the UK population would be non-European origin?