Saturday, August 29, 2009

Greeting Messages New Baby Arrival

cerebral atrophy

A class of East London

My readers may think that I hold a special hatred in the official journal of the UMP (Le Figaro for newcomers). In truth, it does not go a day without a docket duck centro-dextriste afflicts us an article of such intellectual poverty it is essential to expose it to light. The latest example: the disaffection of students has English for French . Excerpts follow:

"French continues to lose ground in English schools. In one year, the number of British schoolboys who have a French test for their GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education, equivalent patent in France) fell 6.5%. In seven years, this figure was almost halved, from 341,000 in 2002 to only 188,000 last year. This represents more than 4 students.

German known as a sharp decline, whereas English is stable - but it has traditionally been less studied. The only languages which are progressing steadily, although still a minority, are Chinese, Polish and Arabic.

Disillusionment with the language of Molière is mainly the result of a political decision 5 years ago. In 2004, the government Tony Blair had removed the requirement to learn at least one foreign language from 14 years - a populist decision which has been criticized by all experts in education.

...

To increase their chances of having good grades, hold more materials called "easy" as the religion [sic], computer, music or physical education, rather than foreign languages deemed difficult. "


There. We are told that the share of French, German and English diminishes the choices of young British foreign languages, but parallel, that of Chinese, Arabic and Polish increases significantly. The most obvious explanation would be understood that 1) the descendants of immigrants in the United Kingdom tend to choose the language of their ancestors as course selection, and as they are becoming more numerous, from "exotic" languages increase in proportion 2) the hegemony of English as global language loss and cultural influence of Old Europe would render obsolete the eyes of many young English learning languages such as French and German.

But no! The "education specialists" (so effective that the educational system of their country is laughing stock of Europe and their young have lost two IQ points in thirty years ) and our rocket scientist Figaro believe that 1) it is the fault of the government, then explained black and white that the disaffection of the French date seven years and the government's decision not date her, that five years 2) young people choose the subjects most easy! As if the Chinese and Arabic were easier to learn than German or French for English speakers! As for being so easy "religion", I do not know what they are but they are undoubtedly consist of a breviary multicultural pantheistic as Western governments know so well put together, or learning a few surahs for Muslims students.

To summarize, once again, those whose profession or vocation, is to inform the public fail miserably in their mission superbly ignoring the real causes of the observed phenomena (immigration and the substitution of population) for tinker explanations devoid of any factual basis, but compatible with the doxa the moment.


Did you know?

According to Richard Lynn, emeritus professor University of Ulster, about 20% of the UK population would be non-European origin?

Monday, August 24, 2009

How Do I Find Expiration On Levitra

Figaro "Reality of miscegenation" Le Figaro and INSEE next to the plate

With our journalists 'right' favorite we learn, oh wonder, that the French fertility continues its meteoric rise and is on track to reach the threshold of 2.1 children per woman needed to renew generations. We all know that if, indeed, the French-born fertility is up from the 90s, women's contribution to non-European national fertility remains considerable. In fact, without the contribution Women of African and North African fertility rate of French women do not succeed in approaching the 2 children per woman and would parallel that of their European peers. Nothing new under the sun.

The result of the section devoted "to the reality of miscegenation," however, is much more edifying

The number of children of mixed couples is growing, too, strongly. In the postwar period, marriages between a French and a person of foreign nationality were rare - around 5%. A stable level until the 1970s, before reaching, gradually, 14% of marriages celebrated in city halls in 2007. This figure reflects only partially the reality of mixed marriages, civil partnerships and cohabitation ignorant.

But statistics can however identify children from at least one foreign parent. They accounted for 8% of births in 1998 and 12, 7% last year. A jump that contrasts with the stability of children born in households with two foreign parents, which is around 6.9%. Miscegenation has become a major demographic shift, with one in five children in some foreign roots.


In Reading this kind of nonsense that we are entitled to ask questions about the intellectual level of those expected to inform the population. First, French nationality is a citizen of paper, an individual may be French and to belong to any race . Then, many people of foreign origin who have acquired French nationality since the 80s marry persons of the same ethnicity but No ATIONALITY foreign . Talking miscegenation (involving two different races) is therefore completely misleading shorthand, since in many cases the spouses belong to the same ethnic group.

So according to the geniuses of INSEE and Figaro, when my neighbor Maghreb, a French citizen, married his cousin just arrived from corn is a mixed marriage, a reality of miscegenation (!). Conversely, when an individual of French nationality but of Senegalese origin puts the ring on the finger of a Breton of the soil, it is not considered a mixed marriage. In contrast, when the Alsatian-born wife, a German European, it's a mixed marriage! You'll understand that in states multiracial, used as the sole criterion for membership of nationality is an absurdity that does not name almost no additional information.

The only reliable way to identify mixed marriages and the rate of interbreeding in France is, like all other civilized countries, to establish ethnic statistics. But that our officials will never accept it. Indeed, more than the "reality of miscegenation" is the reality of ethnic substitution going on in this country who burst into the open.

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Tadalafil Pros And Cons

Is Christianity feminized ? (Add)

Christ Pantocrator Byzantine mosaic

To this question, Dr. Leon J. Podles says yes without any ambiguity in his book The Church Impotent : The Feminization of Christianity ("church impotent: the feminization of Christianity"). The author observes that in all the Western churches (Catholic and Protestant), parishioners are mostly ... of parishioners. Generally in Europe and America, men go to church because their wife, their mother or the girlfriend is forced. West, among the faithful going to mass, the ratio of women to men is about 3 per 1, despite the correction due to age! More church is considered liberal (ie left) and more men are a minority. Conversely, the author notes that the sex ratio is more balanced in the Orthodox churches ("the only Christians to still wear beards") or even become predominantly male among Muslims and Jews. Podles cites several studies showing that men more attracted by the Christian priesthood are those with the most feminine personalities:

"Because Christianity is now seen as partly due to the male rather than female sphere, it sometimes attracts men whose masculinity is rather dubious. For men with masculinity "dubious", I do not imply homosexuals, although a certain type of homosexual could be included. I would rather say that religion is seen as a safe haven, a refuge against the challenges of life, and so it attracts people frightened at the idea of separating from the protected world of childhood, dominated world women. These men have problems to follow the path of male development. Among Catholics, it is also a truism to say that the priests chose the priesthood because of the influence of their mother, and that many priests are very close emotionally to their mothers more than men, including their father. "(Translation Vertumnus)


We are far from the crusaders and inquisitors of the Middle Ages! But why European men, especially the male, they are not attracted by religion? This trend she proceeded to u or is it Christianity emerged in the course of history? The author leans toward the latter.

He said that the idea of personal union with Christ, popularized by Bernard of Clairvaux (after Origen) and mystics such as Teresa of Avila, who is the manager. Unlike Judaism and Islam where God is a stern father who wants to and must be obeyed, the god of the Christians from the second millennium the union wants the merger of the "bride of God" (the Church) and of Christ. Bogeyman of God turns into a comforting mother, with a parallel rise of the cult of Mary. Of Christ Pantocrator ("Almighty") surrounded Uranian glory in the early Byzantine mosaics of inspiration, Christ is increasingly dependent upon his mother in Western iconography, becoming the famous "little" Jesus, baby chubby and innocent, warm in the arms of Mary. The development of this aspect has particularly appealed to women, and we see the author as an explosion of female orders during this period. Conversely , this aspect is particularly repulsive to the male mentality, whose basic nature is separate from the female die to acquire its own existence.

Virgin and Child

The male mind dreams of glory, conquest (in every sense), struggles, a life eternal of fun and feasting to celebrate the Elysian Fields, or at Valhalla, not a merger with the quasi-uterine Grand All, the matrix, the foster mother or the Church. Symbolically, Cronos, the ultimate male, father of Olympian gods breaks (to the tune of obsidian sickle) the merger of his father Ouranos and Gaia her mother so that the world can exist. That may be why other Christian denominations recent, like the Mormons emphasize on life after death more prosaic, the immortal man have his own worlds to colonize and develop, to a scale much greater than ours. The mere idea of being stifled for eternity in the arms of a sweet Pure Love of God causes only very mild enthusiasm among many men, and only a theological revolution may bring the goats lost to the fold.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Low Glycemic Breakfast Cereals

Did you know?


With Figaro, we learn that French films are financed through ticket sales all movies, including Aliens:

" Declining market share of French cinema is never very encouraging. But this is not necessarily bad news. For in the system of financing of French cinema set up by the CNC, the important thing is that the number of entries is increasing. Indeed, the CNC takes a hand on each ticket. The higher the number of tickets sold increases, the revenue will fuel the production of French films will be important. "


So summarize:

1) French cinema is losing money, lots of money. In fact, despite the" part "(duties, taxes unfair, extortion?) Levied by the CNC on the all tickets for the feeding film of hexagonal and lobbying Almighty Studio Canal, French movies attract about a third of the audience.

2) When you go see any movie , whatever their country of origin , you participate directly in financing the film abject hexagonal stuck in his stories sores perverse, without Clipboard heroic and scum-who-will-skip-the-white-du-film . 300 or by going to watch The Lord of the Rings, you've unwittingly funded Between the Walls, A Prophet and Glory. Even if overnight, nobody did any watch French film, it would not change nothing to the problem as the funding of our films is not related to national revenue they reap its own!

3) When this is working and earning money is taxed to support what does not and loses, it's not called socialism?

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Fioricet Is This Like Viciodin

From red to black, switch to the right of Corsican nationalism

parade of young nationalists in Bastia

From the results of no fewer than four studies compiled by the polling institute Ifop and relayed by our friends from identity Novopress , Corsican nationalism, in the early twenty-first century is changing ideological. Some results Bulk:

-35% nationalist supporters are under 35 years -83%
demanding more freedom for business
-75% feel there are too many immigrants in France
-32% vote for John Marie le Pen
-41% only support the independence of the island

Complete data HERE.

activists of the first hour, from the generation of baby boomers, which clearly left, especially in a logical anti-colonial and Marxist. Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, even Boumédienne represented role models. The goal was independence political purely and simply following in the footsteps of the man of the Enlightenment and Father of the Fatherland ( Babbu 'di a Patria ) Pasquale Paoli. The international independence, represented the Journées Internationales de Corte (Corti di Ghjurnate Internaziunale ) also resumed its consideration of all battles "oppressed peoples" Kanak, Palestinians, Basques, etc.. This fringe nationalists, voting massively for José Bové and Arlette Laguiller is currently stalled.

Since the advent of the European Union and the willingness of the French government to a more decentralization, new generations are more difficult to recognize themselves in these struggles of another age. More than politics is now metapolitical, culture, language, traditions, freedom of enterprise which are the subject of unprecedented interest. Jean-Marie Le Pen, prevented landed in Corsica in the 80 by militants, now receives nearly 32% of the votes of nationalists is a striking illustration of the shift (very) behind the movement. The future looks bright for the identitarism on the Island of Beauty. Ghjuventù the avvene if you!

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Terminator Sma-m 1250-2153

"Certify the real"

It is easy for a blogger to lose ground to deform (in) voluntarily facts which it becomes aware. Indeed, the blogger, as his fellow of the era subhuman, often does not receive information only through the distorting mirror of the "remote operators", media orders. It is therefore attempted to correct the firing overinterpreting right information he thinks come from the extreme left. This is the mistake that I had complained during the case "A Prophet " open Cannes Film Festival. To summarize briefly, Jacques Audiard's film deals with a young Maghreb reaching sentenced to carve an empire in a prison hell dominated by Corsican nationalists. Beyond the sound of angry islanders face a stigma emanating from the all-must Parisian intellectual elite, it was possible that the choice of the executioners (Corsica) and heroes (the Maghreb) had been motivated by external factors. Whether a fad or the hard cash by Studio Canal to promote "diversity positive". In short, it was perhaps not deal with filthy leftist filmmaker who was just surfing the zeitgeist. Las

! An interview Jacques Audiard in the World confirms the contrary, all the conclusions that the viewing of his films implied, and that the term "filthy leftist" was a euphemism

" It [the film] serves as First to certify the actual filming as we do ethnography. It is a validation system that produces documentaries and news about the world. "


How to find a sample more revealing than this one? First, the sacrosanct real obsession shared by all sociologists of left and extreme right and the responsibility Studies in Marxism applied. This obsession is coupled with a complete misunderstanding of that reality, because the world is not seen in its stark reality, but through a veil of ideology, a design output scratch brain of individuals totally cut off from their similar. Authors of urban riots becoming "youth linguistic insecurity," the tribal invaders "undocumented migrants" and resistant to destruction of their culture of "fascist." Our lefties do not want just see the real, refuse to confront it in its cruelty and ugliness, which is why they make a glaze for an ideological filter and interpret information without experiencing cognitive dissonance. The leftist, dazzled by the sunlight, decides to wear sunglasses or glasses for the blind. And dealing with fascists or Nazis who still see the light of that sun.

The other statement Audiard, drowned in the middle of verbiage without interest, is so revealing of the mentality of this generation soixantehuitarde your servant could easily lapse into complacency:

"Question: Your hero is a young offender from North Africa who manages to triumph of violence and barbarism by a survival strategy used. It is a magnificent exaltation of individualism and intelligence against subjugation, whether communitarian or nationalist mafia. But at the same time, it does not leave much hope in the use of a collective belief ...

Answer: Yes, it's arguably the fatalistic side of the film. But what to see, too, is the sympathy we feel for the character, and I the first against the actor who embodies it, in which I identify, Tahar Rahim . The fact that he works "for his mouth" does not prevent it from being a character morale. He is someone who has taken the horror taste of blood. It gives such pledges appetite to know and understand that his fate seems hopeful. "


Magnificent! Audiard illustrates perfectly the confusion and apathy of his cohorts, who grew up in France prosperous and European civilization has scuttled its wholly by affectation (the famous claim of "mixed dorms), and finds himself in his old age surrounded by Various she decides to make his heirs, to the detriment of his biological children. What a great hope indeed! Hence the growing importance of non-indigenous young man in cinema hexagonal real dolphin sexagenarian franchouillard decrepit.

feminized generation of 68 weapons so quickly makes it decides to offer his daughters as a gift to the "young" to appease their anger and crossbreed between her thighs. It has become the sole obsession of contemporary French cinema: when the Allogenes, symbol of France's new Muslim male manage to blow up the White symbol of the old Christian France feminized. From Ocean After to First Star, through his Mother Neuilly, everything revolves around the butt of the White and the best way to lay siege. "Certifying the real" in short.

Capture After the film directed by Eliane Ocean Tower

Did you know?

-Jacques Audiard was destined originally to education?

-Eliane de la Tour is an anthropologist, a specialist in West Africa?