Saturday, February 27, 2010

Nike Goalie Jersey 147191

Equal Freedom Secularism

"A society without religion is like a ship without a compass."

Napoleon Bonaparte.

We were learnedly argued that Islam flourished because it met with nothing in front of him. Nature abhors a vacuum, the Mohammedan religion, encouraged by immigrant demography, merely fill a void left by the ebb of the Catholic religion of public space. We were told that it was a religion aggressively oppose a counterweight equal, another aggressive religion. Repeat the Crusades ... or at least the Reconquista, do not sin by optimism.

Well it's something made, the eyes are opened, the voices around the country. Before our very eyes, hundreds of French people, from all political and social circles, have openly opposed the Islamization of our country. The shares are not lacking: the refusal Quick halal , petitions against ritual slaughter and the construction of mosques cathedrals islamovigilantes posters, debate on the burqa. However this is not the name of the Pope or the Church that the French were united. Nor the name of Christianity the twenty-first century. Quite the contrary, many churches are in the eyes of religion Chimene Muslim, seeing it as an ally in their struggle against the societal liberalism, "the veil rather than the string"! This is not Christianity, which served as a vehicle for this move Chin national, but secularism.

As I already explained here, the 1905 law was not intended to drive both the religions of the public space to replace that of the Republic. Agnosticism is not Republican an absence of religion, but a religion without gods without recourse to the supernatural or wonderful. An ideology, like communism or liberalism. In 1905, it was therefore not a fight against religions that tore France but a struggle between religions. Christianity or religion republicanism cons of Human Rights (DDH). Fifteen centuries of difference, Europe reliving the same battle that allowed Christianity to supplant paganism. The chronology indicates a similar procedure: initially destructive rage of a handful of fanatics, followed by relative calm and tolerance promulgated by elites, and ending with the imposition of the new cavalier in religion public space at the expense of the former.

Caricature of the 1905 Act, or the opposition of two religions

The new religion, lacking a solid foundation and a significant popular support, however, must make concessions and engulf the ancient religion in order to facilitate its implementation. When Christianity triumphed over paganism, it has not wiped it. Paganism has been "digested", incorporated into the DNA of Catholicism in the same manner as bacteria became mitochondria of our cells. Catholicism has treated this way large parts of indigenous religions: quasi-polytheism (worship of saints), pilgrimages, worship of sources and telluric forces, creation of a female deity (Saint Mary), development of a pantheon of demonic fury like a gathering of fauna, etc.. Protestantism, more intransigent, more clearly rejected the paganism out of its sphere of influence, the leaving of their own. This, and the Christianization of the late country in Northern Europe explains the greater vitality of paganism in contemporary culture Protestant countries than in Catholic countries.

A similar phenomenon occurred when the religion of DDH has replaced Christianity. Born in the zone of influence of Western Christianity as a discharge is generated senescent by a tree, the religion of DDH is largely based on Christian values. She has evacuated all the supernatural aspects in conflict with scientific advances of the day to keep a vague ideology liberating New Testament. As animals and plants, religions and ideologies constantly evolving, so always be better suited to the contemporary world. When they can no longer cope with the challenges they face, they die sooner or later.

The strength of the religion of DDH was to tame the existing religions, leaving them in practice totally free ... private spheres. In other words, it was necessary to use the language of Rome, that ancient religio agreeing to become superstitio . Christianity, religion intensely personal and introspective, with a developed metaphysics, inherently possessed this ability to see God disappear in favor of Caesar. Indeed, the souls can be saved as well in the discretion and humility of the confessional of the church in the agora. If it was abandoning her empire on the collective destiny of the nation, former cult did not maintain at least a strong influence on the souls of individuals. It was therefore possible to remain Christian and republican French, the two identities each defining its area of influence, in a manner similar to the ancient Roman household gods worshiped her while sacrificing to the Emperor.

However, Islam, like Judaism's , is primarily a law and a orthopraxy, knowing no separation of church and state. A Muslim, even if he sincerely believes in Allah, is a bad Muslim if he does not Ramadan or not praying five times a day towards Mecca. Much Christianity may well cope and survive in the catacombs, as Islam decays when it is confined to the private sphere, like a tree deprived of light. That's why he tries at all costs to interfere in the slightest openings available to them, sinking roots wherever the soil is too loose. Whether through the menu of a canteen, sex segregation in swimming pools or places of prayer in a university, every concession to Islam is considered final and calls for further concessions . It was therefore inevitable that Islam and the religion of DDH enter into open conflict, each claiming supremacy of the public sphere.

Paradoxically, religion HRD seems better suited than the current Christianity to stand up to the Islamization of our country, just as Christianity was better suited than paganism to resist Islam. Indeed, all major Western countries and despite the fact that it hosts the largest Muslim community in Western Europe, it is France that poses the greatest obstacle to the Islamization of space public. It was France, which banned the veil in school (at the point of receiving threats of attacks from Al Qaeda). It was France that debate on the abolition of the burqa. It was France who offended because eight Quick restaurants serve only halal meat. Such cases, which cause little stir in other Western countries, irritate terribly religious conceptions of the French, deeply committed to secularism, ie public religion they adopted in place of Christianity .

We have a formidable ideological weapon. We need to know to use it wisely to defend our identity.


Monday, February 8, 2010

Ottawa Famous Players Silver

dysgenic (+ update)


The dysgenic (from the Greek dys meaning "bad" and gennan "lead") is undoubtedly the worst threat to European civilization. By "dysgenic" means the genetic decline of a people over generations due to the accumulation of negative mutations. More specifically the term is used to mean the biological and intellectual impairment in a population. But then why talk about dysgenic than ever in the history of mankind civilization was not as rich in economic terms, nor scientifically advanced than today?

In reality, the comfort and modern technology does not inform us about the future state of our society, they can only give us an overview of This was done by past generations, a sort of snapshot of the recent past. To understand the evolution and future of our culture, we must observe how natural selection has operated on our populations in recent millennia, and if the forces at work in the past are still relevant in the twenty-first century.

The equation is relentless: in nature, you can not have more descendants than there are resources available to you. Among Europeans, the economist Gregory Clark noted that since the Middle Ages, the fertility rate of individuals was related to their income. In other words, the richest were consistently more offspring than the poor. This reasoning is quite logical: more money helping to feed more mouths. Demographic studies have shown that before the nineteenth century, while the poorest of the English had only 4 children per woman, the wealthy had nearly double!
Given the high infant mortality rate at the time, the poorest of the British were just below the rate of generation change, however, that the wealthiest saw their descendants in every generation occupy an increasing share of the population. According

Clark, under the effect of this favorable demographics, the descendants of the portion of the population the richest and most educated have therefore descended the social ladder to occupy almost all strata of society in the late eighteenth century. The son of landowners became small landowners, small landowners and peasants. The values of the merchant classes of the time (reasoning ability, hard work, long-term gratification, valuing education, inventiveness) are thus infused by cascade population genetic capital of England. When Napoleon treated England "nations of shopkeepers" he was far from suspecting that this designation a reality overlapped in a very tangible effect.

Following England, the same phenomenon occurred in other European countries at different speeds and with varying fortunes, and in the Far East much later, giving birth to the industrial revolutions national. Thus, through natural selection has favored the long term the descendants of people the hardest working and most intelligent of all Western societies has been out of the famous Malthusian trap to build companies of power and a richness unmatched by In the past, innovating faster than it grew in population. The virtuous circle of development had been due to centuries of relative technological stagnation.

However, since the late nineteenth century, many scientists have observed a reversal of the trend described above: the strata of the poorest and least educated have birth rates well above those measured in rich and educated strata . Professor Richard Lynn observed that criminals for example, despite their frequent and lengthy stays in prison twice more children than the general population! Causes are varied to account for the birthrate of the lower strata of society: introduction of universal health care, social aid to disadvantaged strata, abolition of the death penalty for criminals, less strict use of contraception among low educated. Side of the low birthrate of the affluent, we can think the rising cost of higher education need to invest in "quality" rather than "quantity" and a low religiosity . Whatever the causes, the facts are there: each generation, the descendants of the poorest classes and least educated are becoming increasingly common in the pool of the Western population, without even taking into account the cumulative impact of immigration from the Third World.

manifestations of the contamination of society by the underclass are ever more visible: the collapse of literacy of young generations from their elders, decreased the average number of vocabulary words, the resurgence of sexually transmitted diseases related to sexual promiscuity, rising crime rates, teenage pregnancies and births out of wedlock. All these characteristics, conventionally associated with the underclass have now gone into the middle class. Even some benign cultural aspects such as drastic reduction of the length of the shots in movies and video clips or SMS language suggests an adaptation to the tastes of a population of less capable of reflection and thought developed.

A recent study also demonstrated that the intelligence quotient (IQ) to teenagers fell 2 points in thirty years, which is absolutely huge. To illustrate this, suffice it to say that a decrease of 3 IQ points in a population increases the number beneficiaries of social welfare than 7% of births outside marriage than 8%, the imprisonment rate of 12%, the number of those who quit their studies in high school 15%! Another example, more thought: a decrease of 5 IQ points in IQ of a population of 100 double the proportion of mentally retarded (IQ <70)> 130). In short, the decline in IQ terribly weakened the population that suffers and thus its inability to innovate. If the current trend (decrease of 2 IQ points every 30 years) remains one can estimate that the IQ of western populations will collapse in three centuries at the hunter-gatherers from Australia. The human species, or at least the European population, is on track to medium term, get back up the tree she went down a few million years.

It seems that the dysgenic grows because there is no mechanism to enable intelligent people, honest workers and have better reproductive success than people stupid, lazy and offenders. At least, these mechanisms are less effective than in the past. Longer have to work hard to raise a family because it is the whole society through welfare, maintains that the birth of the prolific underclass and well-being through health care increasingly sophisticated and expensive.

Some have imagined an apocalyptic future in which an extremely advanced civilization would have self-destructed by his hubris and arrogance of technology, like an explosion in flight. For my part, I lean more towards an implosion, a slow erosion of civilization, almost painless, in which our descendants will marvel at the degenerate "masterpieces" of contemporary reality, as before the Sistine Chapel.



Addendum: Example perfect illustration of this story:

" In one of the buildings of the residence Subran Piana, society Logirem seven people live in a three- parts. If the housing meets the needs of the family when she moved there in 1999, this is the case today.

Nathalie now occupies the apartment with her husband, the son of the latter, aged 18 years and their four children. There are four girls who have ten four and two years, and the last, barely two months old.

In its housing, Nathalie describes the conditions under which his family lives, "Two children shared one room. With my husband and two small we have the second. Finally, my step-son was obliged to sleep in the lounge on the couch. "

When she learned she was pregnant, Nathalie immediately filed a request to call on all social landlords, a larger dwelling. The family can not afford to rent an apartment from private owners since the couple sees the RSA. That makes it several months awaiting a response. "

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Netscantools Standard Edition 5.0 Appz

The neoracism by hyperclass


Our dear government has cracked a report to" fight against racism on the Internet. "Beyond the purely technical aspects that may have been curious to decrypt leisure on the Web, we find in this report a valuable definition of racism by hyperclass.

Traditionally, the definition of encyclopedic and historical or scientific, racism is the belief that some races are inherently superior to others. However, we can see This definition, dated, has undergone considerable change and according to our elites, the crime of racism is much more inclusive than that. Outside of "racism cyclical" (ie xenophobia "ordinary", emotional), the real racism or "structural racism" is defined in the report (page 18):

"structural racism s' means a form of racism deeply rooted in our societies and which we call willing prejudice. Typically, this form of racism led to admit that certain ethnic groups, religions, "races" or groups of sexual identity are determined characteristics that are common . "

Extraordinary! Assume that there are common characteristics among" races "(note the quotation marks, because the races do not exist it seems), ethnicities, religions ( !) or groups (!!), sexual identity is pure racism! So, theoretically, to say that blacks have darker skin, that lesbians are attracted to women or that Muslims believe in Allah is racist. We understand when the semantic shift undergone by the definition of racism causes two major changes:

-the first and most obvious, is that racism is not only related to race as in the past. It now includes the religious and sexual. It is now possible to be "racist" against a religion or sexual orientation. Hence the appearance of neologisms Islamophobia and homophobia invented draconian associations, nature taking care always to create the words to describe a new phenomenon. Racism is no longer an ideology linked to a hierarchy of races but the simple recognition of a group with common characteristics! Definition suitcase that can treat anyone as racist under false pretenses. As the cons-revolutionary or heretical the racist is a mental projection applicable to anyone and anything.

-second change: this definition is used to delete any community or holistic approach in favor of a purely individual. Since it is impossible to take into account race, religion or anything that is convening to discuss a phenomenon, we are forced to work at the individual level. The individual is the only common denominator. In mathematical terms we can write it by infinity, which is equal to 1. The pure Jacobinism, the total atomization of the individual. The naked man facing the state of anomie Maurice G. Dantec.

Reasons men of the state are also very clear (page 18 always):

"In any case, let those ideas flourish and prejudice is to trivialize what should not be tolerated and promote fragmentation the social body. "

fragmentation of society is the enemy! The existence of different peoples, ideas, worlds, should not be tolerated. The Jacobin pyramidal imagines a world where all individuals are undifferentiated and absolutely equal in all, with the state at the top setting this watch perfect. The true diversity as we encounter in nature is their greatest fear. The high priests of the One would destroy the men to give birth to the Rights. It's antinature par excellence, a monotheism applied to humans, monohominisme .

After the street, the press, radio and television, hyperclass decided to tackle sluggish the last bastion still remains true freedom of expression to the people: the internet. In a way, like most blogs and dissident sites are required to be hosted in the United States to avoid censorship, it is possible to affirm that freedom of expression no longer exists at all on French territory strict sense, the entire (remember that word) of public discourse is framed by the dominant thought. This is the very exact definition of a totalitarian regime . Welcome to the Brave New World, Nation of Human Rights!